Ed Eddy Hit Em Again I Forgot What I Said

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new word or revive an quondam i, please do so on the electric current talk page.

Annal 1

←

Annal 5

Archive 6

Archive seven

Archive viii

Archive 9

Archive 10

After taking a quick glance from a link on the WP:GAN page, I noticed the Critical reception section was a little sparse. It's non much, but I've got 2 tiny comments exterior those mentioned. First, Robin Oliver of The Sydney Morning Herald says "... Information technology's not the best of plans but then that's what makes this testify piece of work then well." (citation: Robin Oliver. "Pay Boob tube". Sydney Morning Herald, The, nineteen/11/2007) I didn't actually have total admission to this article which would've been great but it'south chosen "Cartoon We Love: Ed, Edd north Eddy". (citation: New Zealand Listener; thirteen/11/2004, Vol. 196 Issue 3366, p67) Again, neither of those offer whatsoever really valuable opinions, just could be used to fatten upwards the department nonetheless. Use if yous want to. — 97198 talk 07:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you very much. I've already used the first citation you provided in this section. — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 01:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

I just looked at this article and near every judgement has the "{{Fact|date=July 2008}}" template later it. Just how many do nosotros need for this article to be considered "good?" Things similar "A character enjoying a jawbreaker volition accept characteristic bowling ball-sized bulges on one side of his or her cheek." and "Some are also parodies of movie titles (east.g., the episode "For Your Ed Simply" would be For Your Eyes Only)." seem obvious and don't demand a reference in my opinion. I also think it makes the article look tacky with "citation needed" sticking out every other line. Paper Luigi ^{Talk Contributions} 23:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC) [answer]

In line with this, a few more {{fact}} tags for yous to mull over. I've reworded the premise section lead as it was repeating itself and demand to know if at that place is a reference to The Shining or merely use of a common phrase in one of the given pop culutre reference examples. Also, information technology mentions it being the final blithe series to use traditonal cels which seems a big ol' statement with cypher to dorsum it up too the industry'south progression to predominantly digital production over the terminal decade. treelo _radda 14:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

• I remember that the 2 examples you lot cited should just be removed entirely. They're not really relevant, come to recollect of it. As for the number of sources, I don't remember information technology'due south a number thing, but rather an corporeality of coverage. For instance, if one source devoted a really in-depth coverage, it would be but every bit effective as five or six smaller sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • Help!)} 23:10, xxx July 2008 (UTC) [reply]
• Cheque out expert article criteria, it fairly lays out what needs to be washed. Also, check out WP:GA, there are stats, which correct now, of the 2,480,323 Wikipedia articles, 4,605 are listed below as good article, so it's a pretty serious (and strenuous) process. Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:46, xxx July 2008 (UTC) [reply]
  • Every bit I've made clear before, I'm brusque on time, and all the same am, merely I'll offer these ii quick reviews[1][two] of EEnE'southward most recent DVD releases. Subsequently giving both write-ups a quick browse, they seem to have a more-or-less positive opinion for the show, and I think they could provide adequate citation for some of the more than allegedly dubious claims in the commodity. Thank you! — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 00:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]
    • I've already started fleshing out the critical reception section, and you lot can see my edits here. — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 01:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]
      • Disquisitional reception section is looking meliorate now. Information technology could utilise just a lilliputian more, only I recollect it's long enough for the {{aggrandize}} tag to go. X Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Cleaved clamshells• Otter chirps • Aid!)} 01:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Whilst I appreciate Cinemaniac's citing, all that was done was formatting it to look like a cite rather than actually using the correct cite tags. Only spent the meliorate part of an hour fixing those which were borked. Like I said, substance e'er trumps style here and would ask Cinemaniac read WP:CITE so someone else doesn't have to do cleanup for a adequately honest mistake. treelo _radda twenty:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [respond]

It seems redundant, and then I'm removing information technology. The sentence "It is, as of 2008, the longest-running original cartoon on Drawing Network," is already stated before in the paragraph and is worded better. Newspaper Luigi ^{Talk Contributions} 23:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Which, unfortunately, exemplifies why the commodity, as information technology is, won't laissez passer skillful-article. While no fault of your ain (you're but copy-editing previous text), those kind of statements (especially ones and so bold) need a commendation. Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Sources and citations are now being steadily added to the article. It just takes fourth dimension and patience, is all. :) — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 02:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Lookin' good, guys. I see we accept the dreaded prose tag on this section now. My thought is to delete information technology entirely, and put the information in each character's section on the List of characters page. Thoughts? -- Elaich ^talk 03:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Yeah, it should be done merely isn't that info already there likewise each character anyway? I've never seen a bespeak in listing any of the bandage and/or crew in that manner, we are not IMDb and then yeah, got my endorsement. treelo _radda 09:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

I'd vote for nuking that section, likewise. Same reasons, information technology's an odd format, and the characters page should list voice actors anyways, and so this is basically fluff. Yngvarr (t) (c) 14:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Washed Treelo took care of it. — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 15:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Yay me! treelo _radda 15:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC) [answer]

Characters of cartoon series like this really don't need an entire listing to be described. One single concise section should be plenty. TTN (talk) xx:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC) [answer]

Non for or confronting the merge, just giving a warning to both parties to await a continuation of the issues facing the episode lists. Also, a merge won't happen unless a consensus is reached regarding a list made upwardly mostly of original research and stipulations to just what kind of guesswork can exist added. I can see why the list should stay (length) but can also run across how it shouldn't. treelo _radda 21:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

So, attempt writing some of them and editing them and protecting them from vandalism for a few years on end, TTN. Try adding something constructive for a change, rather than only being a merge bot. -- Elaich ^talk 05:04, 17 Nov 2008 (UTC) [respond]

Yeah, and he merged it anyway, despite the fact that consensus was confronting it. -- Elaich ^talk 07:25, 7 Nov 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Could someone redo the last paragraph in this section since the game has already been released? Paper Luigi ^{Talk • Contributions} 21:14, eight February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Which paragraph and why can't y'all practice information technology? treelo _radda 21:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The paragraph about FusionFall, and I tin can't practise it because I'm not a big fan of the game. Paper Luigi ^{Talk • Contributions} 01:40, 18 Feb 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Right, I can't update it either given I can't detect out anything almost it so someone else who knows FusionFall ameliorate tin update information technology. treelo _radda 09:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC) [respond]

Fianlly Ed, Edd, north Eddy's Large Film testify volition be airing in Denmark on May 31st 2009. It may non exist for America but it's 100% unchangeable proof that the movie exists and will be ambulation.......Love Onepiece226^[ane]Onepiece226 (talk) 03:34, xviii May 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [reply]

Nosotros've been down this road before. When and if it airs on May 31, 2009, and then you tin can add it. Otherwise information technology's the same former shit that'due south been going on for months now. Yngvarr (t) (c) x:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]

No it'due south not? are you kidding me? This is a legit source? It's not like anything people have been maxim from youtube or the3eds? It's an actual site.Onepiece226 (talk) 11:47, eighteen May 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [reply]

No, it's not. All I am maxim is expect until May 31. It's been appear, and announced and re-appear to air multiple times before, and I am skeptical of a site that doesn't come across WP:RS. Or shall I point out the times Cartoon Network has scheduled things, only to pull them at the last infinitesimal, leaving even Tv set Guides in the dust. Yngvarr (t) (c) eleven:56, xviii May 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Ok well now i've got at present 100% of non only the airdate, but that the movie exists you skeptics! looks like after all this time nosotros were right that the picture show was out in that location. I behold the schedule for the austraillian cartoon network with "Ed, Edd, n Eddy's Big Picture Evidence" airing on friday june 5th at 6p.m^[2]Onepiece226 (talk) 18:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [reply]

I've never doubted that the movie exists, it conspicuously does. I'm kinda getting tired with repeating myself, and I know of at to the lowest degree one editor who abased these pages because of these exact reasons. Is there whatever emergency as to why yous want to add together information technology before it airs? WP:CRYSTAL is made for these item situations, and that air date is almost ii weeks abroad. Yngvarr (t) (c) 19:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC) [respond]

No that editor quit because of rumors, I desire something at least put up that the motion-picture show exists instead of something that said they announced it 2 years ago? Movies put they're release dates up on wikipedia as soon as they announce it68.9.147.155 (talk) 22:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [reply]

I'm very sorry that I tin't make this much clearer than I have already tried. You've waited two years, you can wait two more weeks, and run across if it actually airs. Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:ten, 28 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Ok well now that the movie aired in kingdom of denmark and the whole movies is up on youtube, tin we now say something almost it finally?Onepiece226 (talk) 11:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [answer]

I have seen the picture on yotube and it mentioned that information technology took the eds 130 episodes 4 specials and 1 flick to (SPOILER) take the kids similar them. this seams certain that there won't be some other season and that this is the terminate of the seres —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.169.88.81 (talk) 15:ten, 15 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• The picture show has aired in America, and Cartoon Network US advertised A LOT before in the month. And with the addition of Double D stating the total number of episodes (134), specials (4) and movies (but this 1) it took to gain their happy ending, its safe to say that this was the series finale. Plus, the cast and crew has dispered and creator Danny Antonucci has moved over to Wildbrain.UBracter (talk) 02:44, nine November 2009 (UTC) [answer]

Then, I added, and had removed that Santa Claus could briefly be seen in "Jingle, Jingle, Jangle." While not shown in full, he, being pulled by his reindeer, could clearly exist seen waving and he had dialog. Does this non, even if for only that case, make him a character that has been seen? Why would it not? 24.74.90.172 (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• A graphic symbol is someone who appears regularly, not once or a few times. Also, because of the very nature of this show, the customs consensus is that something that happens in only one episode is non catechism and is not notable for mention. -- Elaich ^talk 01:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• All right. Off-white enough. Simply I to say that no character outside of the initial twelve has been shown just doesn't seem right to me. I mean, I empathize "the rule," but he WAS shown. And fifty-fifty if his appearance wasn't catechism, he WAS shown and DID have dialog. His presence was also noted by Ed, and very much so. And I don't understand why Eddy'south brother would be considered a character based on clarification while Rolf'south "Nana" wouldn't be. Rolf talks virtually her all the time. She could be heard clapping in the auditorium. She's certainly more "present" than Eddy's brother, who may I add has only been described past Eddy, who lies quite frequently, and the kids, who all have drastically different conceptions of him. And if a character appears regularly, why wouldn't Plank exist considered a character? Jonny considers him a character and the others accept at some point. Plank was the elected "King of the Cul-de-Sac," Edd talked near being intimidated by "him" while Wrestling, and the Eds interrogated "him" in an attempt to make "him" talk. I may not exist a member, no, just I've been editing manufactures for a long fourth dimension, and so I know my style effectually Wikipedia. In cases similar these, I've seen characters, seen or unseen, animate and inanimate, known or unknown, storyline solid or questionable, referred to every bit characters. —Preceding unsigned annotate added by 24.74.90.172 (talk) 19:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]

There have been some spoilers floating around YouTube,some involving Eddy's Bro's appearence.Shouldn't we add some of the info from the spoilers to the page? User:Supermario6449

• Youtube is not canon, and there is no proof that the 'spoilers' appearing there are genuine. Awhile back, someone doctored a scene from an old EEnE cartoon to endeavour and arrive look like it was a new episode. When and IF the motion-picture show ever airs, it will be added here. Not until. And not until at that place is proof that it really aired, non just announced. That's the way Wikipedia works. -- Elaich ^talk 04:26, ii June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

No about 2 weeks ago i tried placing a link to a danish tv guide stating the movie was going to air on the 31st. It got taken down, merely now it actually aired considering the whole picture show is up on youtube, its patently non fake when its the whole thing, something has finally got to be put upwardly about the movieOnepiece226 (talk) 12:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [reply]

• A search on Youtube for "Ed Edd n Boil movie" revealed many hits that were marked 'trailer (simulated)' and 'Ed Edd n Eddy poop.' I don't know what kind of alternate reality y'all live in, just 'fake' and 'poop' are not REAL. The movie is NOT on Youtube because the movie has never aired nevertheless. Merely because y'all Desire it to be then does not make it so. Simply when information technology actually airs and can exist PROVEN that information technology aired volition it be allowed here. This is an encyclopedia, not a fan site or kid's lodge. -- Elaich ^talk thirteen:39, iii June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Actully,it HAS aired in other countries,Denmark and Austrillia.I even have video with Boil's Bro-(Supermario6449) http://www.youtube.com/sentry?v=avY6UgTFwIk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermario6449 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

As has been REPEATEDLY STATED , and no apologies for the emphasis, YouTube is NOT considered a reliable source. Nor is the 3eds, as a fansite (and a source of the problem, rather than being a solution). Have yous any other reliable source? Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:09, three June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

How could that be fake?The3Eds isn't a fansite,it's a FOURM.Animated,a admin,actully KNOWS Danny,as about admins on EEnE sites do.There is even a TRAILER for the pic,and it's not fanmade.(Supermario6449)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HucK5slr6ZE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermario6449 (talk • contribs) xv:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Please read reliable source guidelines and when you're done, come dorsum hither and I'll ask you lot if you understand why both YouTube and forums and fansites aren't within the scope of reliable sources. Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:37, iii June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

GAH!Look,I KNOW you think that trailer isn't fake,merely your just following the rules.Look at that trailer...does it look imitation? (Supermario6449) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermario6449 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

You desire official????? Hither's OFFICIAL! http://world wide web.cartoonnetwork.com.au/tv/schedule/index.jsp Theres nothing more official then straight from the source, june 5th 2009 'ED, EDD, N Eddy'southward Big PICTURE SHOW" is ambulation. At present I understand the whole youtube matter Elaich, but putting ed, edd, due north eddy movie into youtube is old news, here'southward clips from the moving-picture show,http://world wide web.youtube.com/picket?five=GphNSigmB9E&feature=related oh and think it's imitation? when they're locked in his brothers room, they run into a breakable container that they read "Interruption in case of pic". I understand for 2 years in that location hasent been annihilation about this movie, merely at that place is now. As for the "Source Standards" you lot guys follow, Cartton Network itself is the #1 reliable source. I don't intendance what yous must say, it's real, forget youtube clips, or the 3eds.com, it's a scheduale FROM Cartoon NETWORK! information technology's unarguable.Onepiece226 (talk) 00:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [reply]

• Then, WHEN information technology airs, if there is PROOF that it aired, it volition be immune here. It supposedly aired in Denmark, and that turned out to be simulated. What does it take to get it through your skull that Wikipedia has rules and guidelines? CN has posted schedules before, and then didn't follow through. Then, it IS arguable. Information technology is also not yet a FACT. Encyclopedias publish facts. This is getting and so former. Wikipedia really had to ban any article named after the picture, because 2 years ago fanbois were writing articles talking about the movie as if information technology had already aired. This is not Tweeter, non MySpace, not Facebook, and certainly not the 3eds. The owner of the 3eds SAYS he knows Danny. There is no proof of it. They got faked for months by someone claiming to be Nazzs' phonation actor who was posting all kinds of deatils about the making of the movie. When the real voice player was asked, she said she didn't even know annihilation about a movie. Terminate being so gullible. -- Elaich ^talk 03:15, four June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Being gullible? I dont listen to that other crap so dont pin that on me! The fact that Cartoon Network but a scheduale up saying Ed, edd, eddy big flick show, how is that non enough for you? y'all act like some dude from the3eds.com hacked into cartoon network au and put it in that location? No they didnt! and at that place's fifty-fifty a commercial from austraillia showing all the stuff for summer equally CN usally does, and EEnE'south picture was one of them! I feel that even if the president of CN came on alive tv simply to say the movie is out, you would think it was a robot!Onepiece226 (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [reply]

• Everything that you lot've said here so far illustrates your gullibility! And you still don't go information technology, do you? WHEN THE Film Arrogance, AND Information technology Tin Exist PROVEN THAT IT DID, IT WILL BE ALLOWED Hither. Not UNTIL!!!!!!! At present practice you become it? End of word! -- Elaich ^talk thirteen:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Phb,Nazz'southward voice thespian knows about the movie!Nazz is ane of the main charectors in the picture show! —Preceding unsigned comment added past Supermario6449 (talk • contribs) 22:52, five June 2009 (UTC) [answer]

I know yous're just stubborn Elaich? it's fine we all are on things. Theres merely some facts about this movie exists that you finish to realize? Need I say them more? and cmon gullibility? I told you lot before I heed to fact every bit well, and the fact that a actual cartoon network website had it upwardly on schedule makes you think different? thats just ridiculous? and you lot never answered the question on why it would be upwardly at that place if it dosent be? HmmmmmOnepiece226 (talk) 01:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [respond]

Ane problem I have is that "anybody says" it aired such-and-such a date, but how come I can't find anyone who actually saw it? Have you actually seen it? Not the youtube thing, but the actual airing? Since May 31, I've spent hours googling, and tin only find hearsay. Yngvarr (t) (c) eleven:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC) [answer]

I'k not fifty-fifty certain on the whole May 31st matter ethier, that was in denmark and such. Only I know that on june 5th and the whole weekend after it aired in Austrailia, that'south how that youtube person uploaded a bunch of sceanes from itOnepiece226 (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Onepiece226 [reply]

Your arguments do not meet the policies of WP:Five by a WP:RS. Sorry, but CN/AU schedule on a web page does not meet WP:RS. If you have issues with these policies, you need to bring them up elsewhere, and not edit state of war here anymore. Yngvarr (t) (c) eleven:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The whole movie is non on Youtube, but there are enough short clips to bear witness that the movie did indeed air somewhere. Still, this is not enough to get it mentioned on Wikipedia. We don't know where it aired (the person who posted the clips was from Norway), or the airdate(south). Even though the Australian CN schedule showed it was scheduled, not one editor from Australia has come along to verify that it did. It was supposed to air in Scandinavia in tardily April, but apparently did not air until late May. That shows how reliable CN's schedule is. So, while at that place is hearsay, there is notwithstanding no proof. -- Elaich ^talk 01:xl, 11 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I've gone ahead and updated the section to reflect information that we know for sure. BTW, I've seen statements that the film is considered the series finale, as, according to what I've read, Danny Antonucci has signed a contract to piece of work on some other series with another animation company. Is that truly verifiable? — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 18:twenty, xi June 2009 (UTC) [respond]

The movie is at present on YouTube,BTW.(User:Supermario6449) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermario6449 (talk • contribs) 23:27, eleven June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The movie is at present on youtube and I accept to say that this is the ending of the sereis since it was stated past Edd that it only took 130 episodes 4 specials and 1 movie to have the kids similar them. this statement seams certain that tis is the end of the series —Preceding unsigned annotate added by 173.169.88.81 (talk) xv:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Until at that place is proof from Antonucci only, nosotros should only go on information technology as "current". 72.165.115.67 (talk) 18:04, xv October 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I know everyone wants to know well-nigh the moving picture and its plot, but the "Ed, Edd'n Boil'southward Big Picture show Bear witness" department of the article gives abroad extremely to much of the films plot. What if a fan goes to this commodity ands reads the section unknowingly ruining the moving-picture show for them? There should at least exist a "SPOILERS Warning" or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frogangster (talk • contribs) 23:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• Get-go, we had people for the last 2 years ranting nearly rumors from the movie not existence allowed here. Now, the movie has aired, and we have someone ranting almost too many details being posted. If you don't desire "spoilers" (this is not GameFAQs, BTW) and so don't read about it. The movie is on Youtube, all the details about information technology have been discussed to decease on fan boards. Anyone who doesn't know all about it already has had their head stuck in the sand. Very questionable marketing ploy past CN to show the pic first in out of the way places instead of the United states, which has always been the center of EEnE fandom, but that's neither hither nor at that place. This is an encyclopedia, and we post the facts. Even so, I did move the synopsis of the movie to the "Episodes" page with a spoiler warning. -- Elaich ^talk 23:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• I thought nosotros'd all decided confronting spoiler warnings, Elaich? — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 04:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• The episodes page is the proper place for the synopsis to begin with. -- Elaich ^talk 01:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC) [respond]

• But the spoiler tag—why is that at that place? Consensus seems to be for information technology not to exist utilized anymore, right? — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 02:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• Y'all know what, Cinemaniac? Yous are welcome to go the guardian of this page. I don't see whatsoever spoiler tag. Frankly, I have grown tired of it. You went away because it suited your needs, just others of us stayed. Treelo finally gave up. Yngvaar still edits, bless his heart. A lot of us take washed double duty here fighting the IPs and the trolls sent from fansites. Now, information technology is time for you to take the pb, since EEnE is finished. You took a well deserved vacation, now I will have ane. Information technology'southward all yours, buddy. Try getting a ban on all IP users when the page is existence slammed. I know how to do it. Exercise you? Information technology'southward all yours now. I retire. The series is finished. So am I.

• Really, the spoiler warning that I was referring to is i that y'all apparently placed there yourself ("Exercise not read this if you do not want the plot 'spoiled' for y'all.") But that's really abreast the bespeak now. I recollect there are few loose ends here that need to be tied up. I understand your beingness tired of all the vandalism and trolling (who wouldn't be?), especially since you were the master driving strength against it. Simply you imply that I took a "vacation" and "went away because information technology suited [my] needs". Non actually, Elaich. As I tried to make clear on my user page, I was pretty much forced to quit editing this and other pages around here because of time constraints in my real life — not because I only didn't desire to edit anymore, it'due south just that I really couldn't, y'know?

  While I'd personally rather yous non retire, I'm fully enlightened that only you can make that decision, and that you most probable indeed need a very well-deserved break. If so, let information technology merely be a pause. Yous were a valuable nugget here, and I'd detest to see y'all become for adept. But any you decide to exercise, my friend, I wish you the best of luck. Sincerely. :) — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 16:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I removed the trivia department. At starting time I rewrote it, information technology was poorly written, only then after seeing that the only matter that seemed the least bit worth mentioning was already mentioned in the article, I saw no need to go on information technology. If you desire it back in, then add information technology back in, just delight make certain that it'due south something worth mentioning. Instead of somthing unneccessary like Ed's favorite food used to exist buttered toast than it became Gravy. Sheesh. Mokoniki (talk) xiv:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Mokoniki [respond]

Apparently, if you spotter "Ed, Edd n Eddy'south Large Picture", in 1 of the scenes, for a brusque moment, yous come across a lighthouse. This somewhat resembles Cape Cod. Could Peach Creek be located in Rhode Isle? —Preceding unsigned annotate added by 173.169.215.79 (talk) 15:55, 20 August 2009 (UTC) [answer]

• Peach Creek is located in Canada. The testify is Canadian, as is the creator and the show is designed to be based on his childhood Bigvinu (talk) 19:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I find it highly unlikely that the prove takes identify in Canada. This is especially evident in the episode where they use a bunch of turkey basters as Canadian squirt guns. This would seem like an unlikely thing for Canadian children to be saying. Only the exact location of Peach Creek is non meant to exist anywhere specific. Andy120290 (talk) twenty:06, twenty August 2009 (UTC) [reply]

But seriously, watch the film, and pay attention to when they state on the Ferris Wheel at Mondo-a-go-go. You can run across a lighthouse, that looks ALOT similar the one from Cape Cod. —Preceding unsigned annotate added by 173.169.215.79 (talk) 00:40, 21 Baronial 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Does it really matter where Peach Creek is located.--Yunzei5ds (talk) 19:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Haha, I agree with Yunzei5ds. Mokoniki | talk xix:55, 28 Baronial 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The picture show was premiered in Spanish American 27 september, 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.45.126.189 (talk) 21:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The pic will premiere on Spain half dozen Nov 2009 —Preceding unsigned annotate added by 83.45.124.109 (talk) 05:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

{{Editprotected}}Change the date of original airring! It's over on Nov 8th, 2009

I'm deplorable, we can't change information without a reliable source to dorsum it upwardly. Feel free to restore the {{editprotected}} tag once y'all have one. Cheers,  Skomorokh, barbarian 00:23, eight Nov 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The pic has aired in America, and Drawing Network US advertised A LOT earlier in the month. And with the improver of Double D stating the full number of episodes (134), specials (4) and movies (just this i) it took to gain their happy catastrophe, its condom to say that this was the serial finale. Plus, the cast and crew has dispersed and creator Danny Antonucci has moved over to Wildbrain. So I recollect the show can be stated to have ended on Nov eight, 2009. UBracter (talk) 03:51, ix November 2009 (UTC) [respond]

That was dated September of last year. Until we have solid proof, we tin't say that the series is finished. Lasttiger (talk) 22:54, nine November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• ...How is it not solid proof? The creator has moved on to work at a new studio to help with the development of new animated series, the cast and crew has disbanded according to several of the phonation actors, and no renewal of the series has been appear over the past year, and the article even refers to the movie as beingness the terminal EEnE production. --UBracter (talk) 23:45, ix Nov 2009 (UTC) [respond]

I concur. As far equally airings in the United States are concerned, the show is over. Andy120290 (talk) 23:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I'm not denying it'south the end of the serial. Ed edd n eddy has been around for similar eleven years almost. I'm simply maxim that I haven't heard Antonucci country it but yep it's very possible that the serial is consummate. Lasttiger (talk) 00:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Information technology probably is over, but final I heard annihilation the testify was on hiatus. It could exist like Md Who, which was technically on hiatus from 1989 until the 1996 telefilm. Technically on hiatus the unabridged fourth dimension, with no work beingness done in the long acting. So until in that location'southward an official announcement from Antonucci or Cartoon Network or something, I wouldn't declare it "over" just on indefinite hiatus. —Preceding unsigned annotate added by 68.46.twoscore.92 (talk) 01:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

When Antonucci released the airdate for the American airing of the movie to a popular EEnE fansite (Edtropolis), he stated that this was the finale. And said site is incredibly trustworthy: the owners have contacted and spoken to Danny several times and have gained data of the show before it was officially released to the public by Drawing Network themselves. --UBracter (talk) 02:09, 10 Nov 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Unless you accept real proof that isnt from an unofficial fansite please don't brand bold actions as to say it is finished. You haven't convinced me that the series is over so I am changing information technology dorsum. Toonami (talk) 19:52, 25 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

It'due south most probable over pitiful to say but, I've only read speculation that it's finished. If there is enough demand, information technology could very well be brought back. You lot could e'er start an "Bring Back Ed,Edd, N Eddy" but sometimes even speculation is right. Lasttiger (talk) 21:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Rachel Connor and Mike Kubat should be added. Rachel was headwriter so she should be summit billing with Jono and Mike was an original writer for the show who too worked on the movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.34.125 (talk) 19:24, 28 Jan 2010 (UTC) [reply]

It is unknown if there volition be a sevth season of Ed Edd n Boil notwithstanding, but some guy on Youtube said that there will be a seventh season of Ed Edd due north Eddy I believe that at that place will be i. —Preceding unsigned comment added past Ruin Cireela (talk • contribs) 21:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Proof? You didn't even give the video, y'all just linked to youtube. Even and then, the video might not even be a reliable source. And becides, not only is at that place really isn't a 6th season (unless you lot count the movie and the special -- even so, it'southward too short to be considered another season), but since the picture show ended with anybody (except Jonny and Boil's brother, but Plank told Jonny that there wasn't any time left, and by that I think he/it [she?] meant the entire series) as the Eds friends, fifty-fifty though some of them (Kevin and Sarah mostly) where created just to be the "villians", what more than would at that place be left to do? Bring in new characters? Say that one/some of the kid(s) where lieing about being the Eds' friends? Accept Eddy's brother come up back? Rap up the whole Jonny deal? Throw in Gerta? Show what Jib (Ed'due south "imaginary" friend) looks like? If i of those happens (except for, possibly, Jonny's deal or Eddy's blood brother returning), the series would be and so different (EENE has a actually strict "No other characters" dominion that they followed for ~3 seasons in a row [counting the "breaks"]. Even and then, the only breaks to this dominion where the Kanker sisters, [who appeared in the second episode, barly counts] Jib, [invisable {for now}, left afterwards the same episode] the arms of certain adults, [even so we never saw tham talk, just some activity really quick] the pen pals [sadly never mentioned again], various shadows [don't talk, only testify a oversupply], and, virtually famiously, Eddy's brother [but just for the moving picture]) that it should just basically be in a spinoff. Nifty Pikmin Fan (TD) (Talk) 05:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Here, I will get you the link to youtube become down and click here: http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&5=_ou6uJmJspM Roll down to ngeek95

I incertitude there will exist a Season vii Stuart Snyder the new CEO for CN told the creator to stop making new episodes and cutting the cartoon funding for information technology Matthew Cantrell (talk) 17:30, ix May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

It is already Summer of 2010 and still no new new season or anything. I think it was merely a hoax near a new season. Silver163 (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Comment:

ngeek95 Nope, Season vii is coming Jump 2010! 3 months ago —Preceding unsigned comment added past Ruin Cireela (talk • contribs) 00:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

The person who said it really has no proof, no videos or anything. A youtube comment is very unreliable unless information technology was fabricated past producers or something. Great Pikmin Fan (TD) (Talk) 22:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC) [respond]

The motion picture didn't premiered in Italian republic 16 July, 2009 else 24 July, 2009 and please, add together this: the motion-picture show premired in Espana on 6 November, 2009 and in Latin America on 27 September, 2009 as office of Mes de la risa (Month of the laugh) —Preceding unsigned annotate added by Jugamaes (talk • contribs) 06:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC) [respond]

According to spanish wikipedia a new season volition premire at the end of 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jugamaes (talk • contribs) 21:06, 22 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Any real citations for that claim? Andy120290 (talk) 22:49, 22 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Co-ordinate to the Ed Edd 'n Eddy list of episodes, in that location was another episode of Ed Edd 'n Eddy dated from June four, 2008 (or something like that) where they go to a dance. Is this an actual episode, a special, a never aired episode, or only one not aired in the U.s.a., because I don't think I've seen information technology. —Preceding unsigned annotate added by Ryantheincredible (talk • contribs) 01:57, three June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

I admit I haven't seen every single episode, but I've seen a lot of them. And something makes me uncertainty it (unless the Kankers dragged them at that place) 98.117.129.64 (talk) 05:52, 31 July 2010 (UTC) →Whoop, forgot to log in. lavacano201014 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lavacano201014 for user talk page) 05:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

It is in fact a real episode, I believe eddy, not sure. Wanted to become to try and get a engagement with someone while Edd did not want to go, in the cease to my cognition. I think Edd almost got a kiss from Nazz?

I really deceit retrieve information technology just I do remember them going to a dance equally a sort of season finale before the picture show. 72.153.202.26 (talk) 14:51, eight Baronial 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Woohps, I forgot to log in too. Dobat xiv:51, 8 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added past Dobat (talk • contribs)

{{editsemiprotected}} " I'chiliad Not Coming in Anymore was performed by Hank Williams, causing information technology to be the first song by him to not be land." Should exist removed since that song is incorrectly stated as being the vocal in the video. It'southward shut in name. Withal Hank Williams passed away in 1953, long before cell phones even existed. Making it incommunicable for him to create and sing the music.

Analogrival (talk) 10:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC) [answer]

Done Dabomb87 (talk) 00:38, xx July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Cartoon netowrk united kingdom has aired ed edd eddy large movie show

Who wrote on this folio that the movie is the last of the show and the serial is ended past the motion-picture show? Where did he or she go that information? —Preceding unsigned annotate added by Jugamaes (talk • contribs) 18:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC) [respond]

Antonnucci said it himself at the San Diego Comic Con that the movie was going to be the series finale of Ed, Edd N Boil.76.16.124.73 (talk) 17:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)EENEFan31 [answer]

When will the pic come out on DVD? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jugamaes (talk • contribs) eighteen:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC) [answer]

Unknown. Just 2 flavor were released in 2006 and 2007, and season three were never released. I dubiety that if the pic comeout on DVD or not. If the movie were to exist released on DVD, information technology needs a reliable source to find it. Yet, the consummate series of Ed Edd due north Eddy and the motion picture are at present on iTunes. JJ98 (Talk) 00:01, 23 Oct 2010 (UTC) [respond]

Strangely nobody always seems to mention the Thai dvd sets, which have ALL seasons ALL episodes. AND in englisch with optional english subs, which unremarkably cannot exist said about the ntsc region1 sets... Methinks they should be added in the DVDsection, since -imho- they are legit and are quite good, -i have all- and no bootleg. 9th may 2011 any news on flavour 7 or a dvd release of the Large Film Show? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeDutchDokter (talk • contribs) 10:49, nine May 2011 (UTC) [answer]

Does anyone know what is nether it? It is extremely important and should be included in the article. --188.183.61.228 (talk) 19:29, 24 Jan 2011 (UTC) [answer]

1. ^ "TV Guide for Kingdom of denmark on 05-31-09". Ontv.dk. 2009-17-05. Retrieved 2009-17-05 .
2. ^ Cartoon Network (2009-05-28). "Cartton Network AU Schedule". Drawing Network. Retrieved 2009-v-28.

tarkingtonsculd1974.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AEd,_Edd_n_Eddy%2FArchive_7

Share this post